Wadira: Find your way through Saudi data & privacy law.

Home › Guide › SAMA vs CMA

SAMA vs CMA

How the Saudi Central Bank (SAMA) and the Capital Market Authority (CMA) compare on cybersecurity and data, as at 20 October 2026.

SAMACMA
EntitiesBanks, finance companies, payment providers, credit bureaus (insurers moved to the Insurance Authority)Capital Market Institutions (215 at end-2025); listed issuers for disclosure, offers and governance
BindingYes: CSF is a binding supervisory requirementMain Controls mandatory, although the document is called "guidelines"
MaturityCSF level 3 or higher (a level 4 subdomain requirement for banks is reported, not confirmed)n/a
CloudSAMA approval first; Saudi-located in principle; offshore only with explicit approval (CSF 3.4.3)Cloud services within KSA
OutsourcingWritten no objection for material and overseas outsourcing (Outsourcing Rules Arts 41–42)Security monitoring only to providers within KSA
IncidentsMedium or high incidents to SAMA immediately (CSF 3.3.15)Report immediately; official report after recovery
PDPLSDAIA regulates; SAMA circular 43045328 requires adherence; SDAIA–SAMA MoU (5 February 2025)SDAIA regulates; PDPL applies to CMI client data

A PDPL-compliant transfer does not replace SAMA approval or no objection for offshore cloud or outsourcing.


Content and register data licensed CC BY 4.0. Cite the live URL. Machine-readable register (JSON) · Markdown register · Content last verified: 2026-10-21